Chinas Economic Challenges Amidst Global Competition and U.S. Countermeasures
The 2024 Nobel Prize winners in Economics, Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, and James Robinson, have highlighted a perplexing situation for China. Their core argument posits that authoritarian regimes like China face inherent limits to growth due to exploitative institutions that allow the ruling elite to monopolize wealth. They projected that China would ultimately fail in its economic ambitions. However, reality seems to be unfolding in the opposite direction. Today, China stands as one of the two major powers (G2) competing with the United States for global supremacy. This resurgence is largely fueled by state capitalism, where the government plays a leading role in concentrating national resources and implementing detailed growth strategies for various industries.
Two decades ago, the United States was viewed as a model for China. The latter sought to emulate American market mechanisms and principles of capitalism. Ironically, the tables have turned, with the U.S. now appearing to follow Chinas lead. A recent example of this is Chinas ban on rare earth exports to the U.S., illustrating how Chinas aggressive stance is tightening its grip on America. The U.S. cannot solely rely on market responses to counter this; a swift and direct response is essential, akin to the principle of an eye for an eye.
To contain China, the U.S. is adopting strategies reminiscent of Chinese methods. This shift is evident in several notable measures. First, the acquisition of stakes in private companies has become increasingly common. In August, the U.S. government acquired a 9.9% stake in Intel, becoming its largest shareholder. The U.S. Department of Defense has also become the largest shareholder (15%) in the rare earth producer MP Materials. Discussions are ongoing regarding stake acquisitions in defense contractor Lockheed Martin.
Second, the U.S. is imposing fees for export licenses. Companies like Nvidia and AMD are required to pay 15% of sales to export AI semiconductors to China, a move that resembles an export tax.
Third, the invocation of golden shares has become a tool for the U.S. government to exert control. For instance, Japans Nippon Steel planned to close a steel plant in Illinois acquired in May. The U.S. government intervened by activating its golden share rights, preventing the overseas relocation or closure of the factory.
These strategies indicate a significant shift in the U.S. approach toward China, reflecting a willingness to adopt more assertive economic policies that carry a socialist undertone. As the global landscape evolves, the interplay between Chinas state-driven growth model and the U.S.s countermeasures will continue to shape economic dynamics on a global scale.
Two decades ago, the United States was viewed as a model for China. The latter sought to emulate American market mechanisms and principles of capitalism. Ironically, the tables have turned, with the U.S. now appearing to follow Chinas lead. A recent example of this is Chinas ban on rare earth exports to the U.S., illustrating how Chinas aggressive stance is tightening its grip on America. The U.S. cannot solely rely on market responses to counter this; a swift and direct response is essential, akin to the principle of an eye for an eye.
To contain China, the U.S. is adopting strategies reminiscent of Chinese methods. This shift is evident in several notable measures. First, the acquisition of stakes in private companies has become increasingly common. In August, the U.S. government acquired a 9.9% stake in Intel, becoming its largest shareholder. The U.S. Department of Defense has also become the largest shareholder (15%) in the rare earth producer MP Materials. Discussions are ongoing regarding stake acquisitions in defense contractor Lockheed Martin.
Second, the U.S. is imposing fees for export licenses. Companies like Nvidia and AMD are required to pay 15% of sales to export AI semiconductors to China, a move that resembles an export tax.
Third, the invocation of golden shares has become a tool for the U.S. government to exert control. For instance, Japans Nippon Steel planned to close a steel plant in Illinois acquired in May. The U.S. government intervened by activating its golden share rights, preventing the overseas relocation or closure of the factory.
These strategies indicate a significant shift in the U.S. approach toward China, reflecting a willingness to adopt more assertive economic policies that carry a socialist undertone. As the global landscape evolves, the interplay between Chinas state-driven growth model and the U.S.s countermeasures will continue to shape economic dynamics on a global scale.
Like
0
Upvote0
- PrevThe Struggle for Homeownership in South Korea: A Personal Journey and Policy Reflections
- NextUnderstanding No-Show Fees: A Growing Concern in South Koreas Service Industry
김홍*
이게 나라냐!!
김샛*
정말이지 이런뉴스는 올리지 말아주세요.
박성*
좋은 정보 담아갑니다.
No comments yet.
